Home About us
Products
News
Solution
Video Service Contact us
Home  /  News

To reduce the cost of a mobile stone crusher plant without compromising quality, focus on strategic decisions in equipment selection, supplier negotiation, operational efficiency, and long-term maintenance. Here’s a detailed breakdown of practical strategies:

 

Reduce-The-Cost-Of-A-Mobile-Stone-Crusher-Plant-01.jpg

 

1. Optimize Equipment Configuration Based on Needs

1-1.Match Capacity to Actual Demand

- Avoid over-sizing the plant: Calculate your required throughput (e.g., 100 TPH vs. 200 TPH) and choose a model that precisely meets your needs. Overspecification can increase costs by 30–50%.
- Example: A small construction project needing 80 TPH shouldn’t invest in a 150 TPH plant with unnecessary features.

 

1-2. Select the Right Crusher Type

Choose based on material hardness:
- Jaw crushers: Ideal for primary crushing of hard rocks (e.g., granite), cost-effective for large feed sizes.
- Impact crushers: Cheaper upfront for soft to medium-hard materials (limestone, concrete), but may require more frequent wear part replacements.
- Cone crushers: More expensive but efficient for hard rocks in secondary crushing; consider if fine grading is needed.

 

2. Source Equipment from Reputable but Cost-Effective Suppliers

2-1. Compare Quotes from Multiple Regions

- Chinese manufacturers (e.g., Henan, Shandong provinces) often offer 20–40% lower prices than European or American brands for similar specs, without sacrificing quality.
- Example: A Chinese mobile jaw crusher plant with 100 TPH capacity may cost $150,000–$200,000, while a European equivalent could be $250,000–$350,000.

 

2-2. Consider Refurbished or Used Equipment

- Certified used plants from reputable dealers can save 30–50% of new costs. Ensure:
- A thorough inspection of wear parts (bearings, liners, belts).
- Availability of maintenance records and warranty (even if limited).
- Example: A 3-year-old mobile impact crusher in good condition might cost $100,000 vs. $180,000 new.

 

3. Prioritize Energy Efficiency to Cut Operational Costs

3-1. Choose Energy-Efficient Motors and Components

- Opt for IE3 or higher efficiency motors (saves 10–15% on electricity) and variable frequency drives (VFDs) to adjust speed based on load, reducing energy waste.

- Minimize Energy Loss in the System
- Ensure conveyor belts are properly tensioned and aligned to reduce friction, and use high-efficiency reducers in the drive system.

 

4. Maximize Operational Efficiency and Throughput

4-1. Optimize Feeding and Material Handling

- Use a properly sized vibrating feeder to avoid overloading the crusher, which can cause damage and reduce efficiency. A well-designed feeding system can increase throughput by 10–15%.

 

4-2. Minimize Material Contamination

- Remove metal debris or non-crushable materials before feeding to prevent damage to the crusher, which saves on repair costs and downtime.

 

5. Consider Modular or Mobile-Ready Designs for Flexibility

5-1. Choose a Modular Plant for Future Upgrades

- Modular systems allow you to start with basic components (e.g., primary crusher) and add secondary crushers or screening units later as needs grow, avoiding upfront costs of unnecessary modules.

 

5-2. Opt for a Compact, Easy-to-Transport Design

- A trailer-mounted mobile plant with a compact layout reduces transport costs (e.g., fits on standard trucks) and minimizes setup time at new sites, saving on logistics and labor.

 

6. Explore Government Incentives or Financing Options

61. Seek Tax Deductions or Subsidies

- In some regions, energy-efficient equipment or recycling-focused machinery may qualify for tax breaks or grants. Research local regulations to offset costs.

 

6-2. Consider Lease-to-Own or Financing Plans
- Some suppliers offer installment plans with low upfront payments, allowing you to spread costs over time while putting the plant to use immediately.

 

7. Prioritize Long-Term Durability Over Cheap Short-Term Solutions

7-1. Balance Cost and Quality
- Avoid the cheapest options that use low-grade steel or subpar components (e.g., cast iron vs. manganese steel liners). While upfront costs are lower, frequent replacements and repairs will increase long-term expenses.
- Example: Manganese steel jaw plates cost 30% more but last 2–3 times longer than cast iron, saving on replacement costs.


Conclusion

Reducing the cost of a mobile stone crusher plant requires a balanced approach: prioritize essential features, source wisely from cost-effective regions, optimize energy and maintenance, and focus on long-term durability.  

 

Maybe you are interested in